Thursday

28th Mar 2024

No evidence of 'misuse' of EU money by Palestinian Authority

There is no "conclusive evidence" European money was used for "armed attacks" or "unlawful activities" by the Palestinian Authority since 1997, the

European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) announced on Thursday (17 March) in its closing investigation report on the matter.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Get the EU news that really matters

Instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

  • No conclusive evidence about 'misuse' of EU money in Palestine, but risks cannot be excluded, according to OLAF (Photo: European Commission)

Some of the investigators' findings include a transfer of 238 million US dollars from the Palestinian Authority to Swiss bank accounts between 1997 and early 2000, without international donors having been informed.

However, EU money was not part of the above-mentioned sum. The European Commission took the decision of financially helping Palestine in 1997, but only initiated the payments in November 2000.

Since that time, and up to April 2003, the Commission paid 246.3 million euro to the Palestinian Authority under the programme of Direct Budget Assistance, the latter consisting of "direct payments to the PA's budget which were not linked to any specific kind of expenditure".

After April 2003, the Commission changed the forms of assistance, but paid an additional 145 million euro in the period 2003 - February 2005.

OLAF investigations cover overall payments and conclude there are no evidence EU money was used for "armed attacks".

No misuse, but...

Nevertheless, the report specifies "there are consistent indications to support the hypothesis that it cannot be excluded that some of the assets of the PA may have been used by some individuals for other than the intended purposes".

But OLAF declined to give more precise indications about what exactly "consistent indications" or "other than the intended purposes" meant.

For some, OLAF's report, with its ambiguities, has confirmed their suspicions.

Centre-right German MEP Armin Laschet stated: "It was a mistake to grant EU non-targeted financial aid, which was given between 2000 and 2003 in the form of direct payments to the PA's general budget and was not linked to any specific kind of expenditure".

Mr Laschet also said EU Foreign ministers and the European Commission had been "too credulous" while giving financial aid to the PA.

The European Commission, on the other hand, welcomed OLAF's final report, and agreed with its recommendations.

These include, amongst others, improving "the control (by all donors) of revenues and the expenditure of the PA budget" and setting up a "single system of monitoring".

Also, "the present European Commission support given to the Palestinian Authority to improve their controls and internal audit should be continued and should be reinforced", the report says.

The Anti-Fraud Office launched its investigation in February 2003, following accusations that European Commission's funds to the Palestinian Authority were misused "for terrorist activities".

US and EU breaking taboos to restrain Israel

The US abstained and all EU states on the UN Security Council backed a call for an "immediate ceasefire" in Gaza, as Europe prepares to also blacklist extremist Israeli settlers.

EU warns Russia over Moscow terror attacks

Europe has warned Russia not to use the weekend's terror attacks in Moscow as a pretext to escalate its war in Ukraine and crackdown on internal dissent.

EU summit risks failing Gaza once again, Ireland warns

Austrians and Czechs might block an EU statement calling for an Israeli ceasefire, Ireland warned, as leaders met in Brussels amid starvation in Gaza. Israel's conduct of the war meant it had "squandered the support they had", Leo Varadkar said.

Opinion

Why UK-EU defence and security deal may be difficult

Rather than assuming a pro-European Labour government in London will automatically open doors in Brussels, the Labour party needs to consider what it may be able to offer to incentivise EU leaders to factor the UK into their defence thinking.

Latest News

  1. Kenyan traders react angrily to proposed EU clothes ban
  2. Lawyer suing Frontex takes aim at 'antagonistic' judges
  3. Orban's Fidesz faces low-polling jitters ahead of EU election
  4. German bank freezes account of Jewish peace group
  5. EU Modernisation Fund: an open door for fossil gas in Romania
  6. 'Swiftly dial back' interest rates, ECB told
  7. Moscow's terror attack, security and Gaza
  8. Why UK-EU defence and security deal may be difficult

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersJoin the Nordic Food Systems Takeover at COP28
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersHow women and men are affected differently by climate policy
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersArtist Jessie Kleemann at Nordic pavilion during UN climate summit COP28
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCOP28: Gathering Nordic and global experts to put food and health on the agenda
  5. Friedrich Naumann FoundationPoems of Liberty – Call for Submission “Human Rights in Inhume War”: 250€ honorary fee for selected poems
  6. World BankWorld Bank report: How to create a future where the rewards of technology benefit all levels of society?

Join EUobserver

EU news that matters

Join us